PDA

View Full Version : Patek 5070R (a few pics I took this afternoon)

unknown
11-27-2009, 11:29 AM
http://i845.photobucket.com/albums/ab13/unknown10000/patek5070rmacro3.jpg

http://i845.photobucket.com/albums/ab13/unknown10000/patek5070rmacro5.jpg

http://i845.photobucket.com/albums/ab13/unknown10000/patek5070rmacro4.jpg


http://i845.photobucket.com/albums/ab13/unknown10000/patek5070rmacro15.jpg

http://i845.photobucket.com/albums/ab13/unknown10000/patek5070rmacro16.jpg

http://i845.photobucket.com/albums/ab13/unknown10000/patek5070rmacro11.jpg

http://i845.photobucket.com/albums/ab13/unknown10000/patek5070rmacro10.jpg

http://i845.photobucket.com/albums/ab13/unknown10000/patek5070rmacro13.jpg

http://i845.photobucket.com/albums/ab13/unknown10000/patek5070rmacro7.jpg

http://i845.photobucket.com/albums/ab13/unknown10000/patek5070rmacro8.jpg
harb
11-30-2009, 06:59 AM
Bruno - I'm sure those are lovely photographs but all I can see is this message:

1293

I think you might need to upgrade to Pro...;)
dogtown
03-15-2010, 02:32 AM
I can see em and they are incredible.

super macro HQ. very nice work! and a great watch to be photographed.
John
03-15-2010, 05:42 AM
Magnificent
harb
03-15-2010, 07:10 AM
I can see em and they are incredible.

super macro HQ. very nice work! and a great watch to be photographed.

Thanks for bringing this thread back, dogtown, as I can now see the pictures (Bruno must have upgraded his account...;))

And what fantastic pictures they are!
Bruno - I love the way you've taken them...each shot seems to draw the viewer deeper into the movement.

Great pics of a glorious watch!
Thanks for posting!

harb
red herring
03-17-2010, 03:12 PM
Ordinarily not a huge PP fan, but that's outstanding.
harb
03-18-2010, 07:37 AM
Ordinarily not a huge PP fan, but that's outstanding.

There's time for you yet, Counsellor...;)
red herring
03-18-2010, 09:56 AM
You know Harb, I think it's primarily a matter of size for the most part--PP's tend to be on the small side, and smaller watches just don't look right on me (being on the XL side myself). The 5070 (particularly in RG) at 42mm is, however, something I suppose I could live with if I had to ;).
harb
03-18-2010, 11:11 AM
...being on the XL side myself.

Let me refer my learned friend to my previous comment...

There's time for you yet, Counsellor...;)
red herring
03-22-2010, 09:57 AM
Let me refer my learned friend to my previous comment...

Are you saying I'm going to get shorter?
Sharkman
03-22-2010, 10:03 AM
lovely
harb
03-22-2010, 10:36 AM
Are you saying I'm going to get shorter?

LOL! Forgive me. I took your comment "XL" to mean that you were, shall we say, well-fed...;)...as opposed to being tall :D
Shane
03-22-2010, 11:21 AM
Amazing pics and a beautiful watch - fantastic work :)
red herring
03-24-2010, 09:52 AM
LOL! Forgive me. I took your comment "XL" to mean that you were, shall we say, well-fed...;)...as opposed to being tall :D

I'm relieved--I was about to take all my pants in to be shortened in anticipation (you know, doctor's advice and all). I must admit, however, that I'm adequately nourished as well (6'4", 235 lbs), which simply translates into...XL.
harb
03-25-2010, 07:38 AM
I'm relieved--I was about to take all my pants in to be shortened in anticipation (you know, doctor's advice and all).

LOL!!

Now, even though I know that the term "pants" in the US are what we call trousers here in the UK...our use of the term "pants" refers to underwear...I still could not prevent the mental picture popping up in my mind of you speaking to your tailor about getting your boxer-shorts shortened....LOL!!

For other trouser vs pants hilarity, click here (http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A129647)... :)

It's a mad world...